Module 14 2022

“Legacy” MDD Devices – Tell the Story

Specification

Acceptance Criteria

Testing Protocol/Report

Sample Tested

Justification for Sample Tested

Location in TD

1.01 – Tensile Strength of Tip

>5N

P/R2013-06 – New Tip Design t=0 P/R2013-08 – New Tip Design t=24 P/R2011-03 – Acme t=0 P/R2011-05 – Acme t=24 P/R2011-03 – Acme t=0 P/R2011-05 – Acme t=24 P/R2009-02 – CathBot t=0 P/R2009-05 – CathBot t=36

Acme Catheter 2.0

Same subject device under application

Appendix 83 t=0 Appendix 84 t=24

1.02 – Tensile Strength of Hub

>8N

Acme Catheter 1.0

Hub same as current 2.0 version under application; specification not impacted by tip change to 2.0 Shaft same as current 2.0 version under application; specification not impacted by tip change to 2.0

Appendix 86 t=0 Appendix 87 t=24

1.03 – Liquid Leakage

No leaks at <30 psi

Acme Catheter 1.0

Appendix 86 t=0 Appendix 87 t=24

5.11 – Pouch Peel Strength

> 1N/in

CathBot RX Pouch and tray design identical to Acme 2.0 and mass of CathBot worst case; same

Appendix 88 t=0 Appendix 89 t=36

acceptance criteria and testing method; shelf life greater than subject device

Other content to consider: Location of protocols; Sample size and justification; standard version used; rationale for any deviation to test methods or difference in acceptance criteria