Module232025

07/05/2025

Conclusions

Children better protected now than ever before

Many ethics issues still to be resolved

Mechanism(s) for systemic resolution not immediately obvious Thank you for your attention

The Organisation for Professionals in Regulatory Affairs

43

References (1)

1. The National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. Institutional Review Boards. September 1, 1978. https://repository.library.georgetown.edu/bitstream/handle/10822/778625/ohrp_institutional_review_boa rds_1978.pdf?sequence=1%26isAllowed=y 2. Harris, J. (2005) Scientific research is a moral duty. J. Med. Ethics;31;242-248 8/publication/319024244_Kant_autonomy_and_bioethics/links/615336f8d2ebba7be7572fb6/Kant autonomy-and-bioethics.pdf. Also Donaldson, C.M. (2017) Using Kantian Ethics in Medical Ethics Education. Med.Sci.Educ. 27, 841–845. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-017-0487-0 5. Kamm, F.M. Intricate Ethics: Rights, Responsibilities and Permissible Harm. Oxford: OUP, 2007. 6. Wendler, D. (2010). Are physicians obligated always to act in the patient’s best interests? J.Med.Ethics, 36; 66-70; Birchley, G. (2021)The theorisation of ‘best interests’ in bioethical accounts of decision making. BMC Med Ethics; 22, 68. 7. See http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/supererogation 8. Christensen, E. (2012). The re-emergence of the liberal-communitarian debate in bioethics: exercising self-determination and participation in biomedical research. J.Med.Phil., 37, 255-276. 9. The Medicines for Human Use (Clinical Trials) Regulations 2004, S.I. 1031/2004, Part 3 §15(5)(j), Schedule 3, Part 1, §1(g)(4) and (5). 10. Loth, L.A. (2015). Corrective and distributive justice in tort law: on the restoration of autonomy and a minimal level of protection of the victim. Maastricht J; 22, 788-811. 3. See https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/hast.1077 4. See https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Louise-Campbell

The Organisation for Professionals in Regulatory Affairs

44

22