Spring Intro 2023
16/02/2023
Strategic Planning for a CTA: Study Considerations
Has the Regulatory Authority already approved a previous version of the IMPD? IB? Can you refer to them in your submission?
What is standard of care, acceptability of marketed comparators?
What are the study specifics? Study Phase? First in class? Therapy Area? New formulation?
What information
Sufficient stability data? Does your data support proposed duration of treatment? And patient populations?
already exists?
Preventing Common Agency Qs - Use intelligence/observe trends to improve the quality of core documents
What Regional and Local Knowledge do you have? - Country requirements & Timelines? - Use of VHP? - Previous submission experience in countries
Refer to relevant Guidance: CTFG guidance (2014) - Contraceptive language & CTFG
Q&A Document (2017&2018) - Reference safety information
!Ease the review process for assessors!
11
What was VHP?
Harmonised Scientific Assessment
Voluntary process! Not all MSs were involved
ONE consolidated set of questions
RMS led the review of the single scientific dossier for all selected EU-MSs
Predictable timelines and framework
Review timeline: 75-95
Substantial amendments can be managed via VHP Additional countries possible once initial submission is completed – reduced timeline for add MSs
VHP+ to include some Ecs
No possibility to negotiate with MSs directly
12
Made with FlippingBook Annual report maker